linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: gce: mt8195: Add CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_SECURE_THR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20372e40-e4fc-467a-d91a-fcf8e26728bc@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 23 Sep 2023 20:01:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Elvis Wang <Elvis.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Shawn Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: gce: mt8195: Add
 CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_SECURE_THR_EOF event id

On 18/09/2023 21:21, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_SECURE_THR_EOF is used as secure irq to notify CMDQ
> driver in the normal world that GCE secure thread has completed a task
> in thee secure world.

How can #define be added after its usage? Does it even make any sense of
being separate patch?

Do you folks in Mediatek have any internal review before posting?

Best regards,
Krzysztof