[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230923053515.535607-10-irogers@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 22:35:06 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 09/18] perf mem-events: Avoid uninitialized read
pmu should be initialized to NULL before perf_pmus__scan loop. Fix and
shrink the scope of pmu at the same time. Issue detected by clang-tidy.
Fixes: 5752c20f3787 ("perf mem: Scan all PMUs instead of just core ones")
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
index 39ffe8ceb380..954b235e12e5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ int perf_mem_events__record_args(const char **rec_argv, int *argv_nr,
{
int i = *argv_nr, k = 0;
struct perf_mem_event *e;
- struct perf_pmu *pmu;
for (int j = 0; j < PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX; j++) {
e = perf_mem_events__ptr(j);
@@ -202,6 +201,8 @@ int perf_mem_events__record_args(const char **rec_argv, int *argv_nr,
rec_argv[i++] = "-e";
rec_argv[i++] = perf_mem_events__name(j, NULL);
} else {
+ struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
+
if (!e->supported) {
perf_mem_events__print_unsupport_hybrid(e, j);
return -1;
--
2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists