linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] scsi: scsi_error: Introduce new error handle mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47bed3cb-f307-ec55-5c28-051687dab1ea@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:07:36 +0800
From:   Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <louhongxiang@...wei.com>,
        <lixiaokeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] scsi: scsi_error: Introduce new error handle
 mechanism

On 2023/9/25 22:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Before we add another new error handling mechanism we need to fix the
> old one first.  Hannes' work on not passing the scsi_cmnd to the various
> reset handlers hasn't made a lot of progress in the last five years and
> we'll need to urgently fix that first before adding even more
> complexity.
> 
I observed Hannes's patches posted about one year ago, it has not been
applied yet. I don't know if he is still working on it.

My patches do not depend much on that work, I think the conflict can be
solved fast between two changes.