[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB673481413BA6522B01218297A8FCA@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:56:44 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Gross, Jurgen" <jgross@...e.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 35/37] x86/syscall: Split IDT syscall setup code into
idt_syscall_init()
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> >b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 20bbedbf6dcb..2ee4e7b597a3 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> >@@ -2071,10 +2071,8 @@ static void wrmsrl_cstar(unsigned long val)
> > wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, val);
> > }
> >
> >-/* May not be marked __init: used by software suspend */ -void
> >syscall_init(void)
> >+static inline void idt_syscall_init(void)
> > {
> >- wrmsr(MSR_STAR, 0, (__USER32_CS << 16) | __KERNEL_CS);
> > wrmsrl(MSR_LSTAR, (unsigned long)entry_SYSCALL_64);
> >
> > if (ia32_enabled()) {
> >@@ -2108,6 +2106,15 @@ void syscall_init(void)
> > X86_EFLAGS_AC|X86_EFLAGS_ID);
> > }
> >
> >+/* May not be marked __init: used by software suspend */ void
> >+syscall_init(void) {
> >+ /* The default user and kernel segments */
> >+ wrmsr(MSR_STAR, 0, (__USER32_CS << 16) | __KERNEL_CS);
> >+
> >+ idt_syscall_init();
> >+}
> >+
> > #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
>
> Am I missing something, or is this patch a noop?
Yes, this is a noop, just a cleanup patch w/o functionality change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists