lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230925200659.GB11309@monkey>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:06:59 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-team@...a.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        muchun.song@...ux.dev, leit@...a.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hugetlbfs: replace hugetlb_vma_lock with
 invalidate_lock

On 09/25/23 15:22, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 10:04 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230921]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a
> > note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented
> > in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> OK, so I have a fix for patch 3/3 that gets rid of the
> compile error, but the libhugetlbfs test cases show that
> patch 3/3 opens up a condition where resv_hugepages 
> underflows.
> 
> I have not figured out the cause of that yet, but
> patches 1 & 2 seem to survive all tests fine.

In addition, I suspect patch 3 is going to cause a performance regression.
It is taking me a little while to resurrect the test environment used when
the hugetlb vma lock was introduced.  My plan is to exercise the series in
that environment.

I should be able to review patches 1 & 2 later (my) today.
-- 
Mike Kravetz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ