linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] fprobe: Use ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZRIGSTTTYADzP7QU@krava>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:14:33 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] fprobe: Use ftrace_regs in fprobe entry handler

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 09:15:15PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:41:59 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 10:36:36PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > This allows fprobes to be available with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> > > instead of CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, then we can enable fprobe
> > > on arm64.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > > Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
> > 
> > I was getting bpf selftests failures with this patchset and when
> > bisecting I'm getting crash when running on top of this change
> 
> Thanks for bisecting!
> 
> > 
> > looks like it's missing some of the regs NULL checks added later?
> 
> yeah, if the RIP (arch_rethook_prepare+0x0/0x30) is correct, 
> 
> void arch_rethook_prepare(struct rethook_node *rh, struct ftrace_regs *fregs, bool mcount)
> 
> RSI (the 2nd argument) is NULL. This means fregs == NULL and caused the crash.
> I think ftrace_get_regs(fregs) for the entry handler may return NULL.
> 
> Ah, 
> 
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static void fprobe_init(struct fprobe *fp)
>  		fp->ops.func = fprobe_kprobe_handler;
>  	else
>  		fp->ops.func = fprobe_handler;
> -	fp->ops.flags |= FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS;
> +	fp->ops.flags |= FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_ARGS;
>  }
>  
>  static int fprobe_init_rethook(struct fprobe *fp, int num)
> 
> This may cause the issue, it should keep REGS at this point (this must be done in
> [9/12]). But after applying [9/12], it shouldn't be a problem... 
> 
> Let me check it again.

that helped with the crash, I'll continue bisecting to find out
where it breaks the tests

thanks,
jirka