linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] i2c: designware: Move has_acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:46:45 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] i2c: designware: Move has_acpi_companion() to
 common code

On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 10:56:00PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:43:32PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 7/31/23 23:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > Moving to common code I don't know how well it's splittable into smaller
> > patches or would single bigger patch look better.
> 
> Does this all mean that the series needs to be refactored?

At least that is my impression. Just have no time to look at it (yet).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko