[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRE4iGtfotFz19hq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:36:40 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@...le.hr>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/6] ARM: pxa: Convert Spitz hsync to GPIO descriptors
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 06:42:58PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> Sharp's Spitz still uses the legacy GPIO interface in its wait_for_hsync
We refer to the functions as wait_for_hsync().
> function.
>
> Convert it to use the GPIO descriptor interface.
...
> + hsync = gpiod_get(NULL, "hsync", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(hsync))
> + pr_err("Failed to get hsync GPIO: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(hsync));
So, I didn't get, is this GPIO crucial for functioning or optional?
If the former, we need to stop here or bail out (if possible), do we?
Or should use _optional() API?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists