[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230925081139.1305766-5-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:11:25 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, mhiramat@...nel.org,
qyousef@...alina.io, wvw@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/18] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible
The Energy Model (EM) is going to support runtime modification. There
are going to be 2 EM tables which store information. This patch aims
to prepare the code to be generic and use one of the tables. The function
will no longer get a pointer to 'struct em_perf_domain' (the EM) but
instead a pointer to 'struct em_perf_state' (which is one of the EM's
tables).
Prepare em_pd_get_efficient_state() for the upcoming changes and
make it possible to re-use. Return an index for the best performance
state for a given EM table. The function arguments that are introduced
should allow to work on different performance state arrays. The caller of
em_pd_get_efficient_state() should be able to use the index either
on the default or the modifiable EM table.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
---
include/linux/energy_model.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index b9caa01dfac4..8069f526c9d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -175,33 +175,35 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
/**
* em_pd_get_efficient_state() - Get an efficient performance state from the EM
- * @pd : Performance domain for which we want an efficient frequency
- * @freq : Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @state: List of performance states, in ascending order
+ * @nr_perf_states: Number of performance states
+ * @freq: Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @pd_flags: Performance Domain flags
*
* It is called from the scheduler code quite frequently and as a consequence
* doesn't implement any check.
*
- * Return: An efficient performance state, high enough to meet @freq
+ * Return: An efficient performance state id, high enough to meet @freq
* requirement.
*/
-static inline
-struct em_perf_state *em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
- unsigned long freq)
+static inline int
+em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_state *table, int nr_perf_states,
+ unsigned long freq, unsigned long pd_flags)
{
struct em_perf_state *ps;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
- ps = &pd->table[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_perf_states; i++) {
+ ps = &table[i];
if (ps->frequency >= freq) {
- if (pd->flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
+ if (pd_flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
ps->flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT)
continue;
- break;
+ return i;
}
}
- return ps;
+ return nr_perf_states - 1;
}
/**
@@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
{
unsigned long freq, scale_cpu;
struct em_perf_state *ps;
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, i;
if (!sum_util)
return 0;
@@ -251,7 +253,9 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
* Find the lowest performance state of the Energy Model above the
* requested frequency.
*/
- ps = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd, freq);
+ i = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd->table, pd->nr_perf_states, freq,
+ pd->flags);
+ ps = &pd->table[i];
/*
* The capacity of a CPU in the domain at the performance state (ps)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists