[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230925083425.GB8583@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:34:25 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: rfoss@...nel.org, todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/17] media: qcom: camss: Remove special case for VFE
get/put
Hi Bryan,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:14:03PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> From sdm845 onwards we need to ensure the VFE is powered on prior to
> switching on the CSID.
>
> Currently the code tests for sdm845, sm8250 and then does get/set. This is
> not extensible and it turns out is not necessary either since vfe_get and
> vfe_set reference count.
>
> Remove the over-conservative SoC version check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> # rb3 # db410c
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c
> index 99f651e2021cb..02ae3f5cb0c0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c
> @@ -159,15 +159,12 @@ static int csid_set_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> struct camss *camss = csid->camss;
> struct device *dev = camss->dev;
> struct vfe_device *vfe = &camss->vfe[csid->id];
> - u32 version = camss->res->version;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (on) {
> - if (version == CAMSS_8250 || version == CAMSS_845) {
> - ret = vfe_get(vfe);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - }
Maybe a comment to explain why we call vfe_get() could be useful ?
/*
* From SDM845 onwards, the VFE needs to be powered on before
* switching on the CSID. Do so unconditionally, as there is no
* drawback in following the same powering order on older SoCs.
*/
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> + ret = vfe_get(vfe);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -217,8 +214,7 @@ static int csid_set_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> regulator_bulk_disable(csid->num_supplies,
> csid->supplies);
> pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> - if (version == CAMSS_8250 || version == CAMSS_845)
> - vfe_put(vfe);
> + vfe_put(vfe);
> }
>
> return ret;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists