[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxiRDubLv37ONA+g_ZissLQpdZXoO-442pp=U+-3qQJMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:14:05 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+7a278bf8bfa794494110@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
mszeredi@...hat.com, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in delete_one_xattr (2)
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:04 AM syzbot
<syzbot+7a278bf8bfa794494110@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>
> commit 9df085f3c9a2d4658a9fe323d70c200aa00ede93
> Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> Date: Mon Sep 3 06:12:09 2018 +0000
>
> ovl: relax requirement for non null uuid of lower fs
>
> bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=1711e75a680000
> start commit: ac9a78681b92 Linux 6.4-rc1
> git tree: upstream
> final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=1491e75a680000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1091e75a680000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8bc832f563d8bf38
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a278bf8bfa794494110
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1295e4b8280000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=140af20a280000
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+7a278bf8bfa794494110@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 9df085f3c9a2 ("ovl: relax requirement for non null uuid of lower fs")
>
> For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
[CC the developers who marked reiserfs for deprecation]
Resierfs AND moving files underneath overlayfs.
Not worth much investigation time IMO.
If I could tell syzbot, ignore this report, I would.
Resierfs deletes xattrs from reiserfs_evict_inode() context,
which seems to be related to the lockdep warning.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists