[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aeb2cc43ea4e5281195c8bccd1f033ed73e6a7ef.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:23:10 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
Han Gao <gaohan@...as.ac.cn>, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mmc: sdhci: add __sdhci_execute_tuning() to header
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 13:21 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 22/09/23 04:49, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > Expose __sdhci_execute_tuning() so that it can be called from the
> > mmc host controller drivers.
> >
> > In the sdhci-of-dwcmshc driver, sdhci_dwcmshc_th1520_ops sets
> > platform_execute_tuning to th1520_execute_tuning(). That function has
> > to manipulate phy registers before tuning can be performed. To avoid
> > copying the code verbatim from __sdhci_execute_tuning() into
> > th1520_execute_tuning(), make it possible for __sdhci_execute_tuning()
> > to be called from sdhci-of-dwcmshc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > index ff41aa56564e..fd607058d176 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > @@ -2841,7 +2841,7 @@ void sdhci_send_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_send_tuning);
> >
> > -static int __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> > +int __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>
> Also need
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sdhci_execute_tuning);
>
> > {
> > int i;
By the way should we rename this function? I think
"__sdhci_execute_tuning" vs "sdhci_execute_tuning" might be confusing
when we export both.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists