[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230925140415.00130082@aktux>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:04:15 +0200
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com, chenhuiz@...s.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: imu: mpu6050: add level shifter flag
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:07:58 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:26 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
> >
> > Some boards fail in magnetometer probe if flag is not set.
>
> Which flag? Can you elaborate a bit more?
>
well see $subj. The level shifter flag.
> Does it deserve the Fixes tag?
>
As there are only certain boards affected, they would also have
to add the flag in dtb, I do not think it deservers a Fixes tag.
Even in the board I have here, there are basically two
mpu9150 connected per cable, only one of them needs the flag.
> ...
>
> > unsigned int val;
> > int ret;
>
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->map, 0x1, 0x80,
> > + st->level_shifter ? 0x80 : 0);
>
> This is a bit cryptic, what does 1 stand for?
>
Well, I do not find anything in
https://invensense.tdk.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/MPU-9150-Register-Map.pdf
I have just found a similar line in the ancient 3.0 vendor kernel. No symbolic
names there.
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists