[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6bd8083-94e5-9bb3-7b1e-5bf6cc954baa@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:59:13 -0500
From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
vschneid@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com, sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling
On 9/24/23 22:07, Baoquan He wrote:
> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
> period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
>
> =======
> [ 78.714569] Fallback order for Node 0: 0
> [ 78.714575] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 1817886
> [ 78.717133] Policy zone: Normal
> [ 78.724423] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 78.727207] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 80.056643] PEFILE: Unsigned PE binary
> =======
>
> The memory hotplug events are notified very quickly and very many,
> while the handling of crash hotplug is much slower relatively. So the
> atomic variable __kexec_lock and kexec_trylock() can't guarantee the
> serialization of crash hotplug handling.
>
> Here, add a new mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock to serialize crash
> hotplug handling specifically. This doesn't impact the usage of
> __kexec_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Move mutex lock definition into CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG ifdeffery
> scope in kernel/crash_core.c because the lock is only needed and
> used in that scope. Suggested by Eric.
>
> kernel/crash_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 03a7932cde0a..5951d6366b72 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,17 @@ subsys_initcall(crash_notes_memory_init);
> #undef pr_fmt
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "crash hp: " fmt
>
> +/*
> + * Different than kexec/kdump loading/unloading/jumping/shrinking which
> + * usually rarely happen, there will be many crash hotplug events notified
> + * during one short period, e.g one memory board is hot added and memory
> + * regions are online. So mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock is used to
> + * serialize the crash hotplug handling specifically.
> + */
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(__crash_hotplug_lock);
> +#define crash_hotplug_lock() mutex_lock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +#define crash_hotplug_unlock() mutex_unlock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +
> /*
> * This routine utilized when the crash_hotplug sysfs node is read.
> * It reflects the kernel's ability/permission to update the crash
> @@ -783,9 +794,11 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct kimage *image;
>
> + crash_hotplug_lock();
> /* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
> if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
> + crash_hotplug_unlock();
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -852,6 +865,7 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
> out:
> /* Release lock now that update complete */
> kexec_unlock();
> + crash_hotplug_unlock();
> }
>
> static int crash_memhp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *v)
The crash_check_update_elfcorehdr() also has kexec_trylock() and needs similar treatment.
Userspace (ie udev rule processing) and kernel (crash hotplug infrastrucutre) need to be
protected/serialized from one another.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists