[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB608334D3FBD41B8635E1CBFAFCC3A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:43:00 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "babu.moger@....com" <babu.moger@....com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 7/8] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA
cluster changes
>> My original patch series added an "snc_ways" file to the info/ directory
>> to make this visible. But I was talked out of it because of a lack of clear
>> user mode use case that needs it.
>
> ok. Lets go with it.
Babu,
I'm not sure whether you are voting to bring the snc_ways patch back into
the series. Or to stick with the decision to drop that patch.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists