[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b9a9c0d-8a09-48a4-b996-554d7e1b9340@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 22:18:22 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
"Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@...tonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-samsung-a2015: Add sound
and modem
On 26.09.2023 22:09, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:56:12PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> &blsp_i2c2 {
>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -243,6 +258,13 @@ &gpu {
>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +&lpass {
>>>>> + dai-link@3 {
>>>>> + reg = <MI2S_QUATERNARY>;
>>>>> + qcom,playback-sd-lines = <1>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>> Is that not status = reserved?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Correct. This is here to simplify switching to the modem-bypass audio
>>> routing if someone does not need (or want) the modem. The direct audio
>>> path with the LPASS drivers tends to be more reliable and configurable
>>> (especially wrt bit formats, sampling rates, latency, channels etc).
>>> I know that at some point this helped someone who tried to use an old
>>> phone as some kind of portable musical instrument / synthesizer.
>>>
>>> It's not too obvious that these definitions would be needed when making
>>> those changes (because devices using the standard SD lines (i.e <0>) do
>>> not need it). If you forget about this you get non-functional audio with
>>> no error or any hint what could be wrong.
>>>
>>> To simplify switching between the different audio routing options, the
>>> lk2nd bootloader actually has an option to do this transformation in the
>>> DTB automagically during boot. It's sort of like a DTB overlay that
>>> disables the QDSP6 audio path and enables this node instead. The DAI
>>> links are also adjusted where necessary.
>>>
>>> Do you think a comment would help here?
>> I'd say a comment would be necessary here :D
>>
>
> No problem, I will try to add something simple.
>
>> While I understand this use-case, I believe this is better suited
>> for an actual DTBO or something entirely kept inside lk2nd.
>> Otherwise this looks very confusing to an outside reader.
>>
>
> Translating from the QDSP6 audio setup to the LPASS one is mostly simple
> but not entirely trivial (especially the patching needed for the DAI
> links). Main blocker for DTBOs is that you can only add or change, but
> AFAIK there is no mechanism to _delete_ or fully recreate nodes.
Correct.
>
> I guess I could maybe derive this from the QDSP6 definitions using
> custom magic code, but the code complexity for that is much higher than
> adding these nodes here for completeness.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this is probably more
of a "do we reasonably want this upstream" type question, as
you'll probably get some grumpy emails about upstream not caring
about what's outside the mainline tree..
>
> Let me try to add some comment first.
Please try to explicitly explain the reasoning of why one would
want this change and what are the drawbacks etc.
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists