linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/19] fs: release anon dev_t in deactivate_locked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230926212515.GN800259@ZenIV>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 22:25:15 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] fs: release anon dev_t in deactivate_locked_super

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> How?
> 
> Old sequence before his patch:
> 
> 	deactivate_locked_super()
> 	  -> kill_anon_super()
> 	    -> generic_shutdown_super()
> 	    -> kill_super_notify()
> 	    -> free_anon_bdev()
> 	  -> kill_super_notify()
> 
> New sequence with this patch:
> 
> 	deactivate_locked_super()
> 	  -> generic_shutdown_super()
> 	    -> kill_super_notify()
> 	    -> free_anon_bdev()
> 

Before your patch: foo_kill_super() calls kill_anon_super(),
which calls kill_super_notify(), which removes the sucker from
the list, then frees ->s_fs_info.  After your patch:
removal from the lists happens via the call of kill_super_notify()
*after* both of your methods had been called, while freeing
->s_fs_info happens from the method call.  IOW, you've restored
the situation prior to "super: ensure valid info".  The whole
point of that commit had been to make sure that we have nothing
in the lists with ->s_fs_info pointing to a freed object.

It's not about free_anon_bdev(); that part is fine - it's the
"we can drop the weird second call site of kill_super_notify()"
thing that is broken.

Al, still slogging through the rcu pathwalk races in the methods...
The latest catch: nfs_set_verifier() can get called on a dentry
that had just been seen to have positive parent, but is not
pinned down.
	grab ->d_lock; OK, we know that dentry won't get freed under us
	fetch ->d_parent->d_inode
	pass that to nfs_verify_change_attribute()
... which assumes that inode it's been given is not NULL.  Normally it
would've been - ->d_lock stabilizes ->d_parent, and negative dentries
obviously have no children.  Except that we might've been just hit
by dentry_kill() due to eviction on memory pressure, got ->d_lock
right after that and proceeded to play with ->d_parent, just as
that parent is going through dentry_kill() from the same eviction on
memory pressure...  If it gets to dentry_unlink_inode() before we get to
fetching ->d_parent->d_inode, nfs_verify_change_attribute(NULL, whatever)
is going to oops...