[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230926141530.26bc8550f2f2411945b566f1@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:15:30 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: riel@...riel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
leit@...a.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hugetlbfs: close race between MADV_DONTNEED and
page fault
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:10:51 -0400 riel@...riel.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
>
> Malloc libraries, like jemalloc and tcalloc, take decisions on when
> to call madvise independently from the code in the main application.
>
> This sometimes results in the application page faulting on an address,
> right after the malloc library has shot down the backing memory with
> MADV_DONTNEED.
>
> Usually this is harmless, because we always have some 4kB pages
> sitting around to satisfy a page fault. However, with hugetlbfs
> systems often allocate only the exact number of huge pages that
> the application wants.
>
> Due to TLB batching, hugetlbfs MADV_DONTNEED will free pages outside of
> any lock taken on the page fault path, which can open up the following
> race condition:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
>
> MADV_DONTNEED
> unmap page
> shoot down TLB entry
> page fault
> fail to allocate a huge page
> killed with SIGBUS
> free page
>
> Fix that race by pulling the locking from __unmap_hugepage_final_range
> into helper functions called from zap_page_range_single. This ensures
> page faults stay locked out of the MADV_DONTNEED VMA until the
> huge pages have actually been freed.
>
Was a -stable backport considered?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists