linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless 1/2] ath: dfs_pattern_detector: Fix a memory initialization issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed6a9fe3-9197-4ffd-9fd4-c1a959b7fdc9@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:27:18 -0700
From:   Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
CC:     <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kvalo@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless 1/2] ath: dfs_pattern_detector: Fix a memory
 initialization issue

On 9/25/2023 1:54 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 25/09/2023 à 20:46, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
>> On 9/23/2023 11:57 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> -    cd->detectors = kmalloc_array(dpd->num_radar_types,
>>> +    cd->detectors = kcalloc(dpd->num_radar_types,
>>>                         sizeof(*cd->detectors), GFP_ATOMIC);
>>
>> nit: align descendant on (
> 
> Agreed, but as the code is removed in patch 2/2, I thought that having a 
> smaller diff was a better option.
> 
> Let me know if I should resend the serie.

nevermind, don't bother