lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0786bf5571050397b5075bac7c1e9023bfa5aec.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:02:47 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "anarsoul@...il.com" <anarsoul@...il.com>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: FPDT: break out of the loop if record length is
 zero

On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 14:40 -0700, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Buggy BIOSes may have zero-length records in FPDT, table, as a result
s/FPDT, table/FPDT table


> fpdt_process_subtable() spins in eternal loop.
> 
> Break out of the loop if record length is zero.
> 
> 
> Fixes: d1eb86e59be0 ("ACPI: tables: introduce support for FPDT
> table")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>

Is there a bugzilla or something where such a buggy BIOS is reported?

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> index a2056c4c8cb7..53d8f9601a55 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,11 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address,
> u32 subtable_type)
>                 record_header = (void *)subtable_header + offset;
>                 offset += record_header->length;
>  
> +               if (!record_header->length) {
> +                       pr_info(FW_BUG "Zero-length record
> found.\n");
> +                       break;

For cases like this, it implies the FPDT table is far from usable and
we should stop processing on such platforms.

So, IMO, it is better to
1. return an error here rather than break and return 0.
2. add the error handling for fpdt_process_subtable() failures.

what do you think?

thanks,
rui

> +               }
> +
>                 switch (record_header->type) {
>                 case RECORD_S3_RESUME:
>                         if (subtable_type != SUBTABLE_S3PT) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ