lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:16:34 +0200
From:   Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
To:     Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Cc:     Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/ceph/debugfs: make all files world-readable

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:42 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com> wrote:
> A word of caution about building metrics collectors based on debugfs
> output: there are no stability guarantees.  While the format won't be
> changed just for the sake of change of course, expect zero effort to
> preserve backwards compatibility.

Agree, but there's nothing else. We have been using my patch for quite
some time, and it has been very useful.

Maybe we can discuss promoting these statistics to sysfs/proc? (the
raw numbers, not the existing aggregates which are useless for any
practical purpose)

> The latency metrics in particular are sent to the MDS in binary form
> and are intended to be consumed through commands like "ceph fs top".
> debugfs stuff is there just for an occasional sneak peek (apart from
> actual debugging).

I don't know the whole Ceph ecosystem so well, but "ceph" is a command
that is supposed to run on a Ceph server, and not on a machine that
mounts a cephfs, right? If that's right, then this command is useless
for me.

Max

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ