[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023092614-tummy-dwelling-7063@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:31:03 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
decui@...rosoft.com, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com,
mukeshrathor@...rosoft.com, stanislav.kinsburskiy@...il.com,
jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, will@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] Drivers: hv: Add modules to expose /dev/mshv to
VMMs running on Hyper-V
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:54:34AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 06:52:46AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:07:24PM -0700, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> > > On 9/23/2023 12:58 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Also, drivers should never call pr_*() calls, always use the proper
> > > > dev_*() calls instead.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We only use struct device in one place in this driver, I think that is the
> > > only place it makes sense to use dev_*() over pr_*() calls.
> >
> > Then the driver needs to be fixed to use struct device properly so that
> > you do have access to it when you want to print messages. That's a
> > valid reason to pass around your device structure when needed.
>
> Greg, ACRN and Nitro drivers do not pass around the device structure.
> Instead, they rely on a global struct device. We can follow the same.
A single global struct device is wrong, please don't do that.
Don't copy bad design patterns from other drivers, be better :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists