[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNARd_pRWWso49C4MoahFAM9idyOFC+9ZFYdpS87CA4UTqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:46:53 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Jack Brennen <jbrennen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, maskray@...gle.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: Optimize symbol search from linear to binary search
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:59 AM Jack Brennen <jbrennen@...gle.com> wrote:
> +Elf_Sym *symsearch_find_nearest(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Addr addr,
> +                               unsigned int secndx, bool allow_negative,
> +                               Elf_Addr min_distance)
> +{
> +       size_t hi = elf->symsearch->table_size;
> +       size_t lo = 0;
> +       struct syminfo *table = elf->symsearch->table;
> +       struct syminfo target;
> +
> +       target.addr = addr;
> +       target.section_index = secndx;
> +       target.symbol_index = ~0;  /* compares greater than any actual index */
> +       while (hi > lo) {
> +               size_t mid = lo + (hi-lo)/2;   /* Avoids potential overflow */
> +
> +               if (syminfo_compare(&table[mid], &target) > 0)
> +                       hi = mid;
> +               else
> +                       lo = mid+1;
My preference is "low = mid + 1" over "low = mid+1"
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst suggests spaces
around binary operators.
"
Use one space around (on each side of) most binary and ternary operators,
such as any of these::
        =  +  -  <  >  *  /  %  |  &  ^  <=  >=  ==  !=  ?  :
"
I can see the corresponding line in the checkpatch tool:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.5/scripts/checkpatch.pl#L5330
I wonder why the checkpatch did not detect it.
Maybe, Joe Perches may know the reason.
My previous question about the type inconsistency
was not addressed.
syminfo::symbol_index is unsigned int
symsearch::table_size is size_t
If we encountered a situation where size_t is
really needed for the table_size
(that is, the number of entries does not fit in 32-bit),
syminfo::symbol_index would wrap around.
So, there is no point to use size_t for one,
and (unsigned int) for the other.
In my opinion, (unsigned int) would be enough to count
numbers or index here.
size_t might be 32-bit or 64-bit depending
on the build host architecture.
That is not related to the target architecture
of ELF being processed.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists