| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:32:14 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: j@...nau.net, Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"
CC genpd
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:24 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de> wrote:
> Am 12.09.23 um 22:22 schrieb Janne Grunau via B4 Relay:
> > From: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
> >
> > Multiple power domains need to be handled explicitly in each driver. The
> > driver core can not handle it automatically since it is not aware of
> > power sequencing requirements the hardware might have. This is not a
> > problem for simpledrm since everything is expected to be powered on by
> > the bootloader. simpledrm has just ensure it remains powered on during
> > its lifetime.
> > This is required on Apple silicon M2 and M2 Pro/Max/Ultra desktop
> > systems. The HDMI output initialized by the bootloader requires keeping
> > the display controller and a DP phy power domain on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 61df9ca231075e70
("drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"") in
drm-misc/for-linux-next.
> As a simpledrm patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
>
> Do you want to wait for another review from someone with
> power-management expertise?
Yeah, why not? Let's CC them, so they become aware...
> Do we need a similar patch for ofdrm?
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - removed broken drm_err() log statement only ment for debugging
> > - removed commented cast
> > - use correct format spcifier for 'int' in log statement
> > - add 'continue;' after failure to get device for power_domain
> > - use drm_warn() in non fatal error cases
> > - removed duplicate PTR_ERR conversion
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-v1-1-f8718aefc685@jannau.net
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
> > index ff86ba1ae1b8..9c597461d1e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >
> > #include <drm/drm_aperture.h>
> > @@ -227,6 +228,12 @@ struct simpledrm_device {
> > unsigned int regulator_count;
> > struct regulator **regulators;
> > #endif
> > + /* power-domains */
> > +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
> > + int pwr_dom_count;
> > + struct device **pwr_dom_devs;
> > + struct device_link **pwr_dom_links;
> > +#endif
> >
> > /* simplefb settings */
> > struct drm_display_mode mode;
> > @@ -468,6 +475,101 @@ static int simpledrm_device_init_regulators(struct simpledrm_device *sdev)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
> > +/*
> > + * Generic power domain handling code.
> > + *
> > + * Here we handle the power-domains properties of our "simple-framebuffer"
> > + * dt node. This is only necessary if there is more than one power-domain.
> > + * A single power-domains is handled automatically by the driver core. Multiple
> > + * power-domains have to be handled by drivers since the driver core can't know
> > + * the correct power sequencing. Power sequencing is not an issue for simpledrm
> > + * since the bootloader has put the power domains already in the correct state.
> > + * simpledrm has only to ensure they remain active for its lifetime.
> > + *
> > + * When the driver unloads, we detach from the power-domains.
> > + *
> > + * We only complain about errors here, no action is taken as the most likely
> > + * error can only happen due to a mismatch between the bootloader which set
> > + * up the "simple-framebuffer" dt node, and the PM domain providers in the
> > + * device tree. Chances are that there are no adverse effects, and if there are,
> > + * a clean teardown of the fb probe will not help us much either. So just
> > + * complain and carry on, and hope that the user actually gets a working fb at
> > + * the end of things.
> > + */
> > +static void simpledrm_device_detach_genpd(void *res)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct simpledrm_device *sdev = res;
> > +
> > + if (sdev->pwr_dom_count <= 1)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = sdev->pwr_dom_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + if (!sdev->pwr_dom_links[i])
> > + device_link_del(sdev->pwr_dom_links[i]);
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i]))
> > + dev_pm_domain_detach(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i], true);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int simpledrm_device_attach_genpd(struct simpledrm_device *sdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = sdev->dev.dev;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
> > + "#power-domain-cells");
> > + /*
> > + * Single power-domain devices are handled by driver core nothing to do
> > + * here. The same for device nodes without "power-domains" property.
> > + */
> > + if (sdev->pwr_dom_count <= 1)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_devs = devm_kcalloc(dev, sdev->pwr_dom_count,
> > + sizeof(*sdev->pwr_dom_devs),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!sdev->pwr_dom_devs)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_links = devm_kcalloc(dev, sdev->pwr_dom_count,
> > + sizeof(*sdev->pwr_dom_links),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!sdev->pwr_dom_links)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < sdev->pwr_dom_count; i++) {
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> > + if (IS_ERR(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i])) {
> > + int ret = PTR_ERR(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i]);
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > + simpledrm_device_detach_genpd(sdev);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + drm_warn(&sdev->dev,
> > + "pm_domain_attach_by_id(%u) failed: %d\n", i, ret);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_links[i] = device_link_add(dev,
> > + sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i],
> > + DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> > + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
> > + DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> > + if (!sdev->pwr_dom_links[i])
> > + drm_warn(&sdev->dev, "failed to link power-domain %d\n", i);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, simpledrm_device_detach_genpd, sdev);
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static int simpledrm_device_attach_genpd(struct simpledrm_device *sdev)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * Modesetting
> > */
> > @@ -651,6 +753,9 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
> > if (ret)
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > ret = simpledrm_device_init_regulators(sdev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + ret = simpledrm_device_attach_genpd(sdev);
> > if (ret)
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 15d30b46573d75f5cb58cfacded8ebab9c76a2b0
> > change-id: 20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-f41efa6ad9bc
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists