lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:09:41 +0800
From:   Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, yi.l.liu@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/7] vdpa: change the map/unmap process to support iommufd

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:45 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 01:05:37AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > Add the check for iommufd_ictx,If vdpa don't have the iommufd_ictx
> > then will use the Legacy iommu domain pathway
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > index 91da012084e9..8d1ad89d4671 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
> >       } else if (ops->set_map) {
> >               if (!v->in_batch)
> >                       r = ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
> > +     } else if (!vdpa->iommufd_ictx) {
> > +             /* Legacy iommu domain pathway without IOMMUFD */
> > +             r = iommu_map(v->domain, iova, pa, size,
> > +                           perm_to_iommu_flags(perm));
> >       } else {
> >               r = iommu_map(v->domain, iova, pa, size,
> >                             perm_to_iommu_flags(perm));
>
> Um, why is the 2nd else the same as the new one?
>
the code here seems not in a good logic, I will try to optimize it in
the next version
Thanks
Cindy

> Jason
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists