[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c2f8756-be5c-e2b3-e1a8-d2751a4531a0@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:20:50 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: sfrench@...ba.org, pc@...guebit.com, lsahlber@...hat.com,
sprasad@...rosoft.com, tom@...pey.com, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: avoid possible NULL dereference
On 2023/9/25 23:07, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:52:21PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/smb/client/file.c b/fs/smb/client/file.c
>> index 2108b3b40ce9..37eed057ded0 100644
>> --- a/fs/smb/client/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/smb/client/file.c
>> @@ -4878,6 +4878,12 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
>> struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = container_of(work, struct cifsFileInfo,
>> oplock_break);
>> struct inode *inode = d_inode(cfile->dentry);
>> +
>> + if (!inode) {
>> + cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s : failed to find inode\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
> Are we allowing this in the middle of the declaration block these days?
Really sorry for this, I will modify it right now.
Thanks for your reminder!
Su Hui
>
>> struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(inode);
>> struct cifs_tcon *tcon;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists