[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230926114104.GL1642130@unreal>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:41:04 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add support for netdevice in
containers.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
>
> On 26.09.23 12:48, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > This patch made me wonder, why doesn't SMC use RDMA-CM like all other
> > in-kernel ULPs which work over RDMA?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> The idea behind SMC is that it should look an feel to the applications
> like TCP sockets. So for connection management it uses TCP over IP;
> RDMA is just used for the data transfer.
I think that it is not different from other ULPs. For example, RDS works
over sockets and doesn't touch or reimplement GID management logic.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists