linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230926122009.67735060@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:20:09 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the
 wireless tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/mac80211/key.c

between commits:

  31db78a4923e ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential key use-after-free")
  d097ae01ebd4 ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential key leak")

from the wireless tree and commit:

  2a8b665e6bcc ("wifi: mac80211: remove key_mtx")

from the wireless-next tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/mac80211/key.c
index 0665ff5e456e,ac410f6632b5..000000000000
--- a/net/mac80211/key.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/key.c
@@@ -881,21 -875,20 +880,22 @@@ int ieee80211_key_link(struct ieee80211
  
  		if (link_id >= 0) {
  			link_sta = rcu_dereference_protected(sta->link[link_id],
- 							     lockdep_is_held(&sta->local->sta_mtx));
+ 							     lockdep_is_held(&sta->local->hw.wiphy->mtx));
 -			if (!link_sta)
 -				return -ENOLINK;
 +			if (!link_sta) {
 +				ret = -ENOLINK;
 +				goto out;
 +			}
  		}
  
- 		old_key = key_mtx_dereference(sdata->local, link_sta->gtk[idx]);
+ 		old_key = wiphy_dereference(sdata->local->hw.wiphy,
+ 					    link_sta->gtk[idx]);
  	} else {
  		if (idx < NUM_DEFAULT_KEYS)
- 			old_key = key_mtx_dereference(sdata->local,
- 						      sdata->keys[idx]);
+ 			old_key = wiphy_dereference(sdata->local->hw.wiphy,
+ 						    sdata->keys[idx]);
  		if (!old_key)
- 			old_key = key_mtx_dereference(sdata->local,
- 						      link->gtk[idx]);
+ 			old_key = wiphy_dereference(sdata->local->hw.wiphy,
+ 						    link->gtk[idx]);
  	}
  
  	/* Non-pairwise keys must also not switch the cipher on rekey */
@@@ -910,10 -901,10 +910,8 @@@
  	 * Silently accept key re-installation without really installing the
  	 * new version of the key to avoid nonce reuse or replay issues.
  	 */
--	if (ieee80211_key_identical(sdata, old_key, key)) {
- 		ret = -EALREADY;
- 		goto unlock;
 -		ieee80211_key_free_unused(key);
 -		return 0;
--	}
++	if (ieee80211_key_identical(sdata, old_key, key))
++		return -EALREADY;
  
  	key->local = sdata->local;
  	key->sdata = sdata;
@@@ -936,13 -927,6 +934,10 @@@
  		ieee80211_key_free(key, delay_tailroom);
  	}
  
 +	key = NULL;
 +
 + out:
 +	ieee80211_key_free_unused(key);
-  unlock:
- 	mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->key_mtx);
- 
  	return ret;
  }
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped