linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v4 7/8] drm/gpuvm: generalize dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:59:14 +0200
From:   Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc:     airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, matthew.brost@...el.com,
        thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, sarah.walker@...tec.com,
        donald.robson@...tec.com, christian.koenig@....com,
        faith.ekstrand@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v4 7/8] drm/gpuvm: generalize
 dma_resv/extobj handling and GEM validation

On 9/22/23 13:45, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:42:40 +0200
> Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> +	/**
>> +	 * @DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED: GPUVM is protected externally by the
>> +	 * GPUVM's &dma_resv lock
> 
> I think we need to be more specific, and list the fields/operations
> that need to be externally protected when DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED is
> set.

I agree, we should probably keep a list somewhere. However, there are also
lockdep asserts where a lock is required to be held.

> 
>> +	 */
>> +	DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED = (1 << 0),
>