[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230927175542.GA455424@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 12:55:42 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, abel.vesa@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Make use of PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC()
macro for encoding link speed
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 05:46:02PM +0200, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Instead of hardcoding the link speed in MBps, let's make use of the
> existing PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC() macro that does the encoding of the
> link speed for us. Also, let's Wrap it with QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW()
> macro to do the conversion to ICC speed.
In subject, /Make use of/Use/ would make better use of the subject
line. Lots of "uses" there :)
Above, s/let's//, and also s/make use of/use/.
> +#define QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW(speed) \
> + Mbps_to_icc(PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC(pcie_link_speed[speed]))
It's a shame to have to duplicate this macro in pcie-qcom.c and in
pcie-qcom-ep.c, especially since there's nothing qcom-specific in it.
Would a macro like this fit in interconnect.h?
> - ret = icc_set_bw(pcie_ep->icc_mem, 0, MBps_to_icc(PCIE_GEN1_BW_MBPS));
> + ret = icc_set_bw(pcie_ep->icc_mem, 0, QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW(1));
"1" is not very informative here. Maybe PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT? (I didn't
completely verify that this is equivalent.)
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists