[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29584061-a7e9-5db4-a024-eaf7774a03dd@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:01:40 -0700
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/33] ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe: Increase APR timeout
Hi Mark,
On 9/27/2023 7:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 02:48:19PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> For USB offloading situations, the AFE port start command will result in a
>> QMI handshake between the Q6DSP and the main processor. Depending on if
>> the USB bus is suspended, this routine would require more time to complete,
>> as resuming the USB bus has some overhead associated with it. Increase the
>> timeout to 3s to allow for sufficient time for the USB QMI stream enable
>> handshake to complete.
>
> ...
>
>> -#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 3000
>
> That seems worryingly large but if it's what the hardware/firmware needs
> I guess there's nothing doing - even the 1s that's being replaced would
> be nasty if we ever actually hit it.
I may have gone overkill with the delay, but when I measured the
duration of the AFE start command it took ~1.5-2s. It has to also
account for the overhead within handling the USB QMI request in the
qc_audio_offload driver.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists