| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkbpqMrRrp7Khsgn9Ow5r3ufCgMv+S3Vf_KRTxbrhFLngA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:28:59 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, sjenning@...hat.com, ddstreet@...e.org,
vitaly.wool@...sulko.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] zswap: make shrinking memcg-aware
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:48 PM Domenico Cerasuolo
<cerasuolodomenico@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:17 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > +Chris Li
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:14 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Currently, we only have a single global LRU for zswap. This makes it
> > > impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg cannot
> > > determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing
> > > pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in
> > > practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u
> > >
> > > This patch fully resolves the issue by replacing the global zswap LRU
> > > with memcg- and NUMA-specific LRUs, and modify the reclaim logic:
> > >
> > > a) When a store attempt hits an memcg limit, it now triggers a
> > > synchronous reclaim attempt that, if successful, allows the new
> > > hotter page to be accepted by zswap.
> > > b) If the store attempt instead hits the global zswap limit, it will
> > > trigger an asynchronous reclaim attempt, in which an memcg is
> > > selected for reclaim in a round-robin-like fashion.
> >
> > Hey Nhat,
> >
> > I didn't take a very close look as I am currently swamped, but going
> > through the patch I have some comments/questions below.
> >
> > I am not very familiar with list_lru, but it seems like the existing
> > API derives the node and memcg from the list item itself. Seems like
> > we can avoid a lot of changes if we allocate struct zswap_entry from
> > the same node as the page, and account it to the same memcg. Would
> > this be too much of a change or too strong of a restriction? It's a
> > slab allocation and we will free memory on that node/memcg right
> > after.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/list_lru.h | 39 +++++++
> > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 +
> > > include/linux/zswap.h | 9 ++
> > > mm/list_lru.c | 46 ++++++--
> > > mm/swap_state.c | 19 ++++
> > > mm/zswap.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 6 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> > > index b35968ee9fb5..b517b4e2c7c4 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,24 @@ void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *paren
> > > */
> > > bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * __list_lru_add: add an element to a specific sublist.
> > > + * @list_lru: the lru pointer
> > > + * @item: the item to be added.
> > > + * @memcg: the cgroup of the sublist to add the item to.
> > > + * @nid: the node id of the sublist to add the item to.
> > > + *
> > > + * This function is similar to list_lru_add(), but it allows the caller to
> > > + * specify the sublist to which the item should be added. This can be useful
> > > + * when the list_head node is not necessarily in the same cgroup and NUMA node
> > > + * as the data it represents, such as zswap, where the list_head node could be
> > > + * from kswapd and the data from a different cgroup altogether.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
> > > + */
> > > +bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * list_lru_del: delete an element to the lru list
> > > * @list_lru: the lru pointer
> > > @@ -102,6 +120,18 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
> > > */
> > > bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * __list_lru_delete: delete an element from a specific sublist.
> > > + * @list_lru: the lru pointer
> > > + * @item: the item to be deleted.
> > > + * @memcg: the cgroup of the sublist to delete the item from.
> > > + * @nid: the node id of the sublist to delete the item from.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * list_lru_count_one: return the number of objects currently held by @lru
> > > * @lru: the lru pointer.
> > > @@ -137,6 +167,15 @@ void list_lru_isolate(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item);
> > > void list_lru_isolate_move(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item,
> > > struct list_head *head);
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * list_lru_putback: undo list_lru_isolate.
> > > + *
> > > + * Since we might have dropped the LRU lock in between, recompute list_lru_one
> > > + * from the node's id and memcg.
> > > + */
> > > +void list_lru_putback(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> > > +
> > > typedef enum lru_status (*list_lru_walk_cb)(struct list_head *item,
> > > struct list_lru_one *list, spinlock_t *lock, void *cb_arg);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > > index 67b823dfa47d..05d34b328d9d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > > @@ -1179,6 +1179,11 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_check(struct page *page)
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(struct obj_cgroup *objcg)
> > > +{
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline bool folio_memcg_kmem(struct folio *folio)
> > > {
> > > return false;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/zswap.h b/include/linux/zswap.h
> > > index 2a60ce39cfde..04f80b64a09b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/zswap.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/zswap.h
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio);
> > > void zswap_invalidate(int type, pgoff_t offset);
> > > void zswap_swapon(int type);
> > > void zswap_swapoff(int type);
> > > +bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry);
> > > +void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry);
> > >
> > > #else
> > >
> > > @@ -32,6 +34,13 @@ static inline void zswap_invalidate(int type, pgoff_t offset) {}
> > > static inline void zswap_swapon(int type) {}
> > > static inline void zswap_swapoff(int type) {}
> > >
> > > +static inline bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
> > > +{
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry) {}
> > > +
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #endif /* _LINUX_ZSWAP_H */
> > > diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
> > > index a05e5bef3b40..37c5c2ef6c0e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/list_lru.c
> > > +++ b/mm/list_lru.c
> > > @@ -119,18 +119,26 @@ list_lru_from_kmem(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, void *ptr,
> > > bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> > > {
> > > int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) ?
> > > + mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item) : NULL;
> > > +
> > > + return __list_lru_add(lru, item, nid, memcg);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
> > > +
> > > +bool __list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > +{
> > > struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
> > > - struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > > struct list_lru_one *l;
> > >
> > > spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
> > > if (list_empty(item)) {
> > > - l = list_lru_from_kmem(lru, nid, item, &memcg);
> > > + l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
> > > list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
> > > /* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
> > > if (!l->nr_items++)
> > > - set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
> > > - lru_shrinker_id(lru));
> > > + set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
> >
> > Unrelated diff.
> >
> > > nlru->nr_items++;
> > > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
> > > return true;
> > > @@ -138,17 +146,27 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> > > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__list_lru_add);
> > >
> > > bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> > > {
> > > int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) ?
> > > + mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item) : NULL;
> > > +
> > > + return __list_lru_del(lru, item, nid, memcg);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
> > > +
> > > +bool __list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > +{
> > > struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
> > > struct list_lru_one *l;
> > >
> > > spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
> > > if (!list_empty(item)) {
> > > - l = list_lru_from_kmem(lru, nid, item, NULL);
> >
> > If we decide to keep the list_lru.c changes, do we have any other
> > callers of list_lru_from_kmem()?
>
> I see a commit already in mm-unstable that removes it.
>
> >
> > > + l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
> > > list_del_init(item);
> > > l->nr_items--;
> > > nlru->nr_items--;
> > > @@ -158,7 +176,7 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
> > > spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__list_lru_del);
> > >
> > > void list_lru_isolate(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item)
> > > {
> > > @@ -175,6 +193,20 @@ void list_lru_isolate_move(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item,
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_isolate_move);
> > >
> > > +void list_lru_putback(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct list_lru_one *list =
> > > + list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
> > > +
> > > + if (list_empty(item)) {
> > > + list_add_tail(item, &list->list);
> > > + if (!list->nr_items++)
> > > + set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_putback);
> > > +
> > > unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru,
> > > int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> > > index b3b14bd0dd64..1c826737aacb 100644
> > > --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> > > +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/swap_slots.h>
> > > #include <linux/huge_mm.h>
> > > #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
> > > +#include <linux/zswap.h>
> > > #include "internal.h"
> > > #include "swap.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -417,6 +418,7 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > struct folio *folio;
> > > struct page *page;
> > > void *shadow = NULL;
> > > + bool zswap_lru_removed = false;
> > >
> > > *new_page_allocated = false;
> > > si = get_swap_device(entry);
> > > @@ -485,6 +487,17 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > __folio_set_locked(folio);
> > > __folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Page fault might itself trigger reclaim, on a zswap object that
> > > + * corresponds to the same swap entry. However, as the swap entry has
> > > + * previously been pinned, the task will run into an infinite loop trying
> > > + * to pin the swap entry again.
> > > + *
> > > + * To prevent this from happening, we remove it from the zswap
> > > + * LRU to prevent its reclamation.
> > > + */
> > > + zswap_lru_removed = zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(entry);
> > > +
> >
> > This will add a zswap lookup (and potentially an insertion below) in
> > every single swap fault path, right?. Doesn't this introduce latency
> > regressions? I am also not a fan of having zswap-specific details in
> > this path.
> >
> > When you say "pinned", do you mean the call to swapcache_prepare()
> > above (i.e. setting SWAP_HAS_CACHE)? IIUC, the scenario you are
> > worried about is that the following call to charge the page may invoke
> > reclaim, go into zswap, and try to writeback the same page we are
> > swapping in here. The writeback call will recurse into
> > __read_swap_cache_async(), call swapcache_prepare() and get EEXIST,
> > and keep looping indefinitely. Is this correct?
> >
> > If yes, can we handle this by adding a flag to
> > __read_swap_cache_async() that basically says "don't wait for
> > SWAP_HAS_CACHE and the swapcache to be consistent, if
> > swapcache_prepare() returns EEXIST just fail and return"? The zswap
> > writeback path can pass in this flag and skip such pages. We might
> > want to modify the writeback code to put back those pages at the end
> > of the lru instead of in the beginning.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, this actually works and it seems cleaner so I think
> we'll go for your solution.
>
> >
> > > if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, NULL, gfp_mask, entry))
> > > goto fail_unlock;
> > >
> > > @@ -497,6 +510,9 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > if (shadow)
> > > workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
> > >
> > > + if (zswap_lru_removed)
> > > + zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(entry);
> > > +
> > > /* Caller will initiate read into locked folio */
> > > folio_add_lru(folio);
> > > *new_page_allocated = true;
> > > @@ -506,6 +522,9 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > return page;
> > >
> > > fail_unlock:
> > > + if (zswap_lru_removed)
> > > + zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(entry);
> > > +
> > > put_swap_folio(folio, entry);
> > > folio_unlock(folio);
> > > folio_put(folio);
> > > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > > index 412b1409a0d7..1a469e5d5197 100644
> > > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/writeback.h>
> > > #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > +#include <linux/list_lru.h>
> > >
> > > #include "swap.h"
> > > #include "internal.h"
> > > @@ -171,8 +172,8 @@ struct zswap_pool {
> > > struct work_struct shrink_work;
> > > struct hlist_node node;
> > > char tfm_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
> > > - struct list_head lru;
> > > - spinlock_t lru_lock;
> > > + struct list_lru list_lru;
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *next_shrink;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ struct zswap_entry {
> > > unsigned long value;
> > > };
> > > struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> > > + int nid;
> > > struct list_head lru;
> > > };
> >
> > Ideally this can be avoided if we can allocate struct zswap_entry on
> > the correct node.
>
> We didn't consider allocating the entry on the node without charging it to the
> memcg, we'll try it and if it's doable it would be a good compromise to avoid
> adding the node id here.
>
> >
> > >
> > > @@ -309,6 +311,29 @@ static void zswap_entry_cache_free(struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > > kmem_cache_free(zswap_entry_cache, entry);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*********************************
> > > +* lru functions
> > > +**********************************/
> > > +static bool zswap_lru_add(struct list_lru *list_lru, struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = entry->objcg ?
> > > + get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
> >
> > This line is repeated at least 3 times, perhaps add a helper for it?
> > get_mem_cgroup_from_zswap()?
> >
> > > + bool added = __list_lru_add(list_lru, &entry->lru, entry->nid, memcg);
> > > +
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > + return added;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool zswap_lru_del(struct list_lru *list_lru, struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = entry->objcg ?
> > > + get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
> > > + bool removed = __list_lru_del(list_lru, &entry->lru, entry->nid, memcg);
> > > +
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > + return removed;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*********************************
> > > * rbtree functions
> > > **********************************/
> > > @@ -393,9 +418,7 @@ static void zswap_free_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry)
> > > if (!entry->length)
> > > atomic_dec(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
> > > else {
> > > - spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > - list_del(&entry->lru);
> > > - spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > + zswap_lru_del(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > zpool_free(zswap_find_zpool(entry), entry->handle);
> > > zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
> > > }
> > > @@ -629,21 +652,16 @@ static void zswap_invalidate_entry(struct zswap_tree *tree,
> > > zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int zswap_reclaim_entry(struct zswap_pool *pool)
> > > +static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_one *l,
> > > + spinlock_t *lock, void *arg)
> > > {
> > > - struct zswap_entry *entry;
> > > + struct zswap_entry *entry = container_of(item, struct zswap_entry, lru);
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > > struct zswap_tree *tree;
> > > pgoff_t swpoffset;
> > > - int ret;
> > > + enum lru_status ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
> > > + int writeback_result;
> > >
> > > - /* Get an entry off the LRU */
> > > - spin_lock(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > - if (list_empty(&pool->lru)) {
> > > - spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > - entry = list_last_entry(&pool->lru, struct zswap_entry, lru);
> > > - list_del_init(&entry->lru);
> > > /*
> > > * Once the lru lock is dropped, the entry might get freed. The
> > > * swpoffset is copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd again
> > > @@ -651,26 +669,35 @@ static int zswap_reclaim_entry(struct zswap_pool *pool)
> > > */
> > > swpoffset = swp_offset(entry->swpentry);
> > > tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(entry->swpentry)];
> > > - spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > + list_lru_isolate(l, item);
> > > + spin_unlock(lock);
> > >
> > > /* Check for invalidate() race */
> > > spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> > > if (entry != zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swpoffset)) {
> > > - ret = -EAGAIN;
> > > goto unlock;
> > > }
> > > /* Hold a reference to prevent a free during writeback */
> > > zswap_entry_get(entry);
> > > spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > >
> > > - ret = zswap_writeback_entry(entry, tree);
> > > + writeback_result = zswap_writeback_entry(entry, tree);
> > >
> > > spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - /* Writeback failed, put entry back on LRU */
> > > - spin_lock(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > - list_move(&entry->lru, &pool->lru);
> > > - spin_unlock(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > + if (writeback_result) {
> > > + zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
> > > +
> > > + /* Check for invalidate() race */
> > > + if (entry != zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swpoffset))
> > > + goto put_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + memcg = entry->objcg ? get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(entry->objcg) : NULL;
> > > + spin_lock(lock);
> > > + /* we cannot use zswap_lru_add here, because it increments node's lru count */
> > > + list_lru_putback(&entry->pool->list_lru, item, entry->nid, memcg);
> > > + spin_unlock(lock);
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > + ret = LRU_RETRY;
> > > goto put_unlock;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -686,19 +713,63 @@ static int zswap_reclaim_entry(struct zswap_pool *pool)
> > > zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
> > > unlock:
> > > spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > > - return ret ? -EAGAIN : 0;
> > > + spin_lock(lock);
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct zswap_pool *pool;
> > > + int nid, shrunk = 0;
> > > + bool is_empty = true;
> > > +
> > > + pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
> > > + if (!pool)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
> > > + unsigned long nr_to_walk = 1;
> > > +
> > > + if (list_lru_walk_one(&pool->list_lru, nid, memcg, &shrink_memcg_cb,
> > > + NULL, &nr_to_walk))
> > > + shrunk++;
> > > + if (!nr_to_walk)
> >
> > nr_to_walk will be 0 if we shrunk 1 page, so it's the same condition
> > as the above, right?
> >
> > is_empty seems to be shrunk == 0 if I understand correctly, seems like
> > there is no need for both.
>
> It is indeed 0 when we shrunk 1 page, but it could also be 0 also when the
> reclaim failed and the list was not empty.
I see.
I still think the function can be clearer / more aesthetic, but I
don't really know how off the top of my head :)
>
> >
> > > + is_empty = false;
> > > + }
> > > + zswap_pool_put(pool);
> > > +
> > > + if (is_empty)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (shrunk)
> > > + return 0;
> > > + return -EAGAIN;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> > > {
> > > struct zswap_pool *pool = container_of(w, typeof(*pool),
> > > shrink_work);
> > > - int ret, failures = 0;
> > > + int ret, failures = 0, memcg_selection_failures = 0;
> > >
> > > + /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion. */
> > > do {
> > > - ret = zswap_reclaim_entry(pool);
> > > + /* previous next_shrink has become a zombie - restart from the top */
> >
> > Do we skip zombies because all zswap entries are reparented with the objcg?
> >
> > If yes, why do we restart from the top instead of just skipping them?
> > memcgs after a zombie will not be reachable now IIUC.
> >
> > Also, why explicitly check for zombies instead of having
> > shrink_memcg() just skip memcgs with no zswap entries? The logic is
> > slightly complicated.
>
> I think you have a point here, I'm not sure if the iteration can go on once we
> get a zombie, if it can, we'll just skip it.
If the point of skipping zombies is that we know their list_lrus are
reparented, so we will end up scanning their parents again, then I
believe we can just skip them. This should be "hidden" within
shrink_memcg() in my opinion, with a clear comment explaining why we
skip zombies.
>
> >
> > > + if (pool->next_shrink && !mem_cgroup_online(pool->next_shrink)) {
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(pool->next_shrink);
> > > + pool->next_shrink = NULL;
> > > + }
> > > + pool->next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, pool->next_shrink, NULL);
> > > +
> > > + /* fails to find a suitable cgroup - give the worker another chance. */
> > > + if (!pool->next_shrink) {
> > > + if (++memcg_selection_failures == 2)
> > > + break;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = shrink_memcg(pool->next_shrink);
> > > +
> > > if (ret) {
> > > - zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
> > > if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> > > break;
> > > if (++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
> > > @@ -764,9 +835,8 @@ static struct zswap_pool *zswap_pool_create(char *type, char *compressor)
> > > */
> > > kref_init(&pool->kref);
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->list);
> > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->lru);
> > > - spin_lock_init(&pool->lru_lock);
> > > INIT_WORK(&pool->shrink_work, shrink_worker);
> > > + list_lru_init_memcg(&pool->list_lru, NULL);
> > >
> > > zswap_pool_debug("created", pool);
> > >
> > > @@ -831,6 +901,9 @@ static void zswap_pool_destroy(struct zswap_pool *pool)
> > >
> > > cpuhp_state_remove_instance(CPUHP_MM_ZSWP_POOL_PREPARE, &pool->node);
> > > free_percpu(pool->acomp_ctx);
> > > + list_lru_destroy(&pool->list_lru);
> > > + if (pool->next_shrink)
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(pool->next_shrink);
> > > for (i = 0; i < ZSWAP_NR_ZPOOLS; i++)
> > > zpool_destroy_pool(pool->zpools[i]);
> > > kfree(pool);
> > > @@ -1199,8 +1272,10 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > struct scatterlist input, output;
> > > struct crypto_acomp_ctx *acomp_ctx;
> > > struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> > > struct zswap_pool *pool;
> > > struct zpool *zpool;
> > > + int lru_alloc_ret;
> > > unsigned int dlen = PAGE_SIZE;
> > > unsigned long handle, value;
> > > char *buf;
> > > @@ -1218,14 +1293,15 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > if (!zswap_enabled || !tree)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * XXX: zswap reclaim does not work with cgroups yet. Without a
> > > - * cgroup-aware entry LRU, we will push out entries system-wide based on
> > > - * local cgroup limits.
> > > - */
> > > objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(folio);
> > > - if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg))
> > > - goto reject;
> > > + if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg)) {
> > > + memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
> > > + if (shrink_memcg(memcg)) {
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > + goto reject;
> > > + }
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* reclaim space if needed */
> > > if (zswap_is_full()) {
> > > @@ -1240,7 +1316,11 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > else
> > > zswap_pool_reached_full = false;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > + pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
> > > + if (!pool) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto reject;
> > > + }
> > > /* allocate entry */
> > > entry = zswap_entry_cache_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (!entry) {
> > > @@ -1256,6 +1336,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > entry->length = 0;
> > > entry->value = value;
> > > atomic_inc(&zswap_same_filled_pages);
> > > + zswap_pool_put(pool);
> > > goto insert_entry;
> > > }
> > > kunmap_atomic(src);
> > > @@ -1264,6 +1345,15 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > if (!zswap_non_same_filled_pages_enabled)
> > > goto freepage;
> > >
> > > + if (objcg) {
> > > + memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
> > > + lru_alloc_ret = memcg_list_lru_alloc(memcg, &pool->list_lru, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > +
> > > + if (lru_alloc_ret)
> > > + goto freepage;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* if entry is successfully added, it keeps the reference */
> > > entry->pool = zswap_pool_current_get();
> > > if (!entry->pool)
> > > @@ -1325,6 +1415,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > >
> > > insert_entry:
> > > entry->objcg = objcg;
> > > + entry->nid = page_to_nid(page);
> > > if (objcg) {
> > > obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, entry->length);
> > > /* Account before objcg ref is moved to tree */
> > > @@ -1338,9 +1429,8 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> > > zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, dupentry);
> > > }
> > > if (entry->length) {
> > > - spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > - list_add(&entry->lru, &entry->pool->lru);
> > > - spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
> > > + zswap_lru_add(&pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > >
> > > @@ -1447,9 +1537,8 @@ bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
> > > zswap_invalidate_entry(tree, entry);
> > > folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> > > } else if (entry->length) {
> > > - spin_lock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > - list_move(&entry->lru, &entry->pool->lru);
> > > - spin_unlock(&entry->pool->lru_lock);
> > > + zswap_lru_del(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > + zswap_lru_add(&entry->pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > }
> > > zswap_entry_put(tree, entry);
> > > spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > > @@ -1507,6 +1596,48 @@ void zswap_swapoff(int type)
> > > zswap_trees[type] = NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +bool zswap_remove_swpentry_from_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
> > > +{
> > > + struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(swpentry)];
> > > + struct zswap_entry *entry;
> > > + struct zswap_pool *pool;
> > > + bool removed = false;
> > > +
> > > + /* get the zswap entry and prevent it from being freed */
> > > + spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> > > + entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swp_offset(swpentry));
> > > + /* skip if the entry is already written back or is a same filled page */
> > > + if (!entry || !entry->length)
> > > + goto tree_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + pool = entry->pool;
> > > + removed = zswap_lru_del(&pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > +
> > > +tree_unlock:
> > > + spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > > + return removed;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void zswap_insert_swpentry_into_lru(swp_entry_t swpentry)
> > > +{
> > > + struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[swp_type(swpentry)];
> > > + struct zswap_entry *entry;
> > > + struct zswap_pool *pool;
> > > +
> > > + /* get the zswap entry and prevent it from being freed */
> > > + spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> > > + entry = zswap_rb_search(&tree->rbroot, swp_offset(swpentry));
> > > + /* skip if the entry is already written back or is a same filled page */
> > > + if (!entry || !entry->length)
> > > + goto tree_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + pool = entry->pool;
> > > + zswap_lru_add(&pool->list_lru, entry);
> > > +
> > > +tree_unlock:
> > > + spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*********************************
> > > * debugfs functions
> > > **********************************/
> > > @@ -1560,7 +1691,7 @@ static int zswap_setup(void)
> > > struct zswap_pool *pool;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - zswap_entry_cache = KMEM_CACHE(zswap_entry, 0);
> > > + zswap_entry_cache = KMEM_CACHE(zswap_entry, SLAB_ACCOUNT);
> > > if (!zswap_entry_cache) {
> > > pr_err("entry cache creation failed\n");
> > > goto cache_fail;
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists