linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add documentation for D:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFhGd8q+cbqi3v=tyVKYVHEUTymc9HhRBSN4M1UFgVn7F29aqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 12:30:36 +0900
From:   Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add documentation for D:

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:27 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 03:19 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > Document what "D:" does.
> >
> > This is more or less the same as what "K:" does but only works for patch
> > files.
>
> Nack.  I'd rather just add a !$file test to K: patterns.

Are there no legitimate use cases for K:'s current behavior to warrant
keeping it around?

>