linux-kernel - [Patch v4 12/13] KVM: x86/pmu: Handle PERF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230927033124.1226509-13-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:31:23 +0800
From:   Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Xiong <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
        Lv Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>,
        Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
        Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v4 12/13] KVM: x86/pmu: Handle PERF_METRICS overflow

When the fixed counter 3 overflows, the PMU would also triggers an
PERF_METRICS overflow subsequently. This patch handles the PERF_METRICS
overflow case, it would inject an PMI into guest and set the
PERF_METRICS overflow bit in PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS MSR after detecting
PERF_METRICS overflow on host.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |  7 ++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c           | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index df56e091eb25..5c3271772d75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3053,8 +3053,13 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 	 * Intel Perf metrics
 	 */
 	if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
+		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT];
+
 		handled++;
-		static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL);
+		if (event && is_vmetrics_event(event))
+			READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, &data, regs);
+		else
+			static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL);
 	}
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index fad7b2c10bb8..06c815859f77 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void kvm_pmi_trigger_fn(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 	kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(vcpu);
 }
 
-static inline void __kvm_perf_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, bool in_pmi)
+static inline void __kvm_perf_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, bool in_pmi, bool metrics_of)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
 	bool skip_pmi = false;
@@ -121,7 +121,11 @@ static inline void __kvm_perf_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, bool in_pmi)
 						      (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
 		}
 	} else {
-		__set_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
+		if (metrics_of)
+			__set_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT,
+				  (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
+		else
+			__set_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_status);
 	}
 
 	if (!pmc->intr || skip_pmi)
@@ -141,11 +145,18 @@ static inline void __kvm_perf_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, bool in_pmi)
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMI, pmc->vcpu);
 }
 
+static inline bool is_vmetrics_event(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+			INTEL_FIXED_VMETRICS_EVENT;
+}
+
 static void kvm_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
 			      struct perf_sample_data *data,
 			      struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = perf_event->overflow_handler_context;
+	bool metrics_of = is_vmetrics_event(perf_event);
 
 	/*
 	 * Ignore overflow events for counters that are scheduled to be
@@ -155,7 +166,7 @@ static void kvm_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event,
 	if (test_and_set_bit(pmc->idx, pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi))
 		return;
 
-	__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, true);
+	__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, true, metrics_of);
 
 	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmc->vcpu);
 }
@@ -490,7 +501,7 @@ static void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 		goto reprogram_complete;
 
 	if (pmc->counter < pmc->prev_counter)
-		__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, false);
+		__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, false, false);
 
 	if (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_PIN_CONTROL)
 		printk_once("kvm pmu: pin control bit is ignored\n");
-- 
2.34.1