lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230927055528.GP1642130@unreal>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:55:28 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add support for netdevice in
 containers.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:42:09AM +0800, Dust Li wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:35:45AM +0800, Albert Huang wrote:
> >If the netdevice is within a container and communicates externally
> >through network technologies like VXLAN, we won't be able to find
> >routing information in the init_net namespace. To address this issue,
> 
> Thanks for your founding !
> 
> I think this is a more generic problem, but not just related to VXLAN ?
> If we use SMC-R v2 and the netdevice is in a net namespace which is not
> init_net, we should always fail, right ? If so, I'd prefer this to be a bugfix.

BTW, does this patch take into account net namespace of ib_device?

Thanks

> 
> Best regards,
> Dust
> 
> >we need to add a struct net parameter to the smc_ib_find_route function.
> >This allow us to locate the routing information within the corresponding
> >net namespace, ensuring the correct completion of the SMC CLC interaction.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
> >---
> > net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 ++-
> > net/smc/smc_ib.c | 7 ++++---
> > net/smc/smc_ib.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> >index bacdd971615e..7a874da90c7f 100644
> >--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> >+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> >@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> > 		(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)aclc;
> > 	struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> > 		smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, false);
> >+	struct net *net = sock_net(&smc->sk);
> > 	int rc;
> > 
> > 	if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1)
> >@@ -1210,7 +1211,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> > 		memcpy(ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac, &aclc->r0.lcl.mac, ETH_ALEN);
> > 		ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway = false;
> > 	} else {
> >-		if (smc_ib_find_route(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> >+		if (smc_ib_find_route(net, smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> > 				      smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4(aclc->r0.lcl.gid),
> > 				      ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac,
> > 				      &ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway))
> >diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> >index 9b66d6aeeb1a..89981dbe46c9 100644
> >--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> >+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> >@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ bool smc_ib_port_active(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport)
> > 	return smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1].state == IB_PORT_ACTIVE;
> > }
> > 
> >-int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> >+int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > 		      u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway)
> > {
> > 	struct neighbour *neigh = NULL;
> >@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > 
> > 	if (daddr == cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE))
> > 		goto out;
> >-	rt = ip_route_output_flow(&init_net, &fl4, NULL);
> >+	rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, &fl4, NULL);
> > 	if (IS_ERR(rt))
> > 		goto out;
> > 	if (rt->rt_uses_gateway && rt->rt_gw_family != AF_INET)
> >@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> > 	if (smcrv2 && attr->gid_type == IB_GID_TYPE_ROCE_UDP_ENCAP &&
> > 	    smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4((u8 *)&attr->gid) != cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE)) {
> > 		struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(ndev);
> >+		struct net *net = dev_net(ndev);
> > 		const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
> > 		bool subnet_match = false;
> > 
> >@@ -248,7 +249,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> > 		}
> > 		if (!subnet_match)
> > 			goto out;
> >-		if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(smcrv2->saddr,
> >+		if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(net, smcrv2->saddr,
> > 						       smcrv2->daddr,
> > 						       smcrv2->nexthop_mac,
> > 						       &smcrv2->uses_gateway))
> >diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.h b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> >index 4df5f8c8a0a1..ef8ac2b7546d 100644
> >--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> >+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> >@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void smc_ib_sync_sg_for_device(struct smc_link *lnk,
> > int smc_ib_determine_gid(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport,
> > 			 unsigned short vlan_id, u8 gid[], u8 *sgid_index,
> > 			 struct smc_init_info_smcrv2 *smcrv2);
> >-int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> >+int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> > 		      u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway);
> > bool smc_ib_is_valid_local_systemid(void);
> > int smcr_nl_get_device(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
> >-- 
> >2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ