[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0d93be1-4343-b48f-3474-cd1f2f5cfe9a@amlogic.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:59:27 +0800
From: Huqiang Qin <huqiang.qin@...ogic.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
jbrunet@...libre.com, martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: dts: Add watchdog node for Amlogic C3 SoCs
On 2023/9/26 16:03, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-c3.dtsi
>> @@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ apb4: bus@...00000 {
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x480000>;
>>
>> + watchdog@...0 {
>> + compatible = "amlogic,c3-wdt", "amlogic,t7-wdt";
> Does this pass dtbs_check?
> The binding patch doesn't seem to permit this combo..
>
Ah... I ran dtbs_check again, and there is indeed
`watchdog@...0: compatible: ['amlogic,c3-wdt', 'amlogic,t7-wdt'] is too long`
in the output.
I'll correct it in the next version, thanks for pointing it out.
Best regards,
Huqiang Qin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists