lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:04:25 +0200
From:   Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@...aro.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] configfs-tsm: Introduce a shared ABI for
 attestation reports

Hi Dan,

> On 9/25/2023 9:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/tsm.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef __TSM_H
> > +#define __TSM_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +
> > +#define TSM_INBLOB_MAX 64

I guess @inblob is supposed to (possibly) accommodate nonces from a
challenger, correct?
If so, 64 bytes may not be enough for attesters that produce
EAT-formatted reports -- see [1], and [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-eat-21.html#section-4.1-5
[2] https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/421/files

cheers, thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ