[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230927110219.b5n3fbbwrxtcwtzp@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:02:19 +0300
From: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, weihong.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/x86/lam: Zero out buffer for readlink()
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 07:33:46AM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> Zero out the buffer for readlink() since readlink() does not append a
> terminating null byte to the buffer.
>
> Fixes: 833c12ce0f430 ("selftests/x86/lam: Add inherit test cases for linear-address masking")
>
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> index eb0e46905bf9..9f06942a8e25 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int handle_execve(struct testcases *test)
> perror("Fork failed.");
> ret = 1;
> } else if (pid == 0) {
> - char path[PATH_MAX];
> + char path[PATH_MAX] = {0};
Shouldn't it be PATH_MAX+1 to handle the case when readlink(2) stores
exactly PATH_MAX bytes into the buffer?
>
> /* Set LAM mode in parent process */
> if (set_lam(lam) != 0)
>
> base-commit: ce9ecca0238b140b88f43859b211c9fdfd8e5b70
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists