linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for sc7280 soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230927124149.GB18050@thinkpad>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:41:49 +0200
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To:     Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mani@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, bvanassche@....org,
        avri.altman@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for
 sc7280 soc

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:48:56PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Add UFS host controller and PHY nodes for sc7280 soc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 66f1eb83cca7..0b50b8557311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -3353,6 +3353,69 @@
>  			};
>  		};
> 
> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@...4000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
> +				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
> +			lanes-per-direction = <2>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> +			reset-names = "rst";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x80 0x0>;
> +			dma-coherent;
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_1_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
> +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
> +				      "iface_clk",
> +				      "core_clk_unipro",
> +				      "ref_clk",
> +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> +				      "rx_lane1_sync_clk";

Please add the interconnect properties since mainline has the support.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்