[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfkZwYimkT6ki6+jPEZ7gNcWbg7c8ZJ8mXbEYxpmSqmTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:02:59 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com, chenhuiz@...s.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: imu: mpu6050: add level shifter flag
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:38 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
>
> Some boards fail in magnetometer probe if level shifter flag is not set,
> definition was found in a 3.0 vendor kernel.
I would rather use the more standard (IIUC the versioning here)
"...in the vendor Linux kernel v3.0." (also note article change).
Same for all cases below.
I believe Jonathan can update this when applying, otherwise the code looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists