linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI: PCC: Define and use the common PCC shared memory regions related macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hq37x_v6Z0Vqj2h8D5QZM8zWE4=GfrMk7YAEfUjeRydA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:19:21 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI: PCC: Define and use the common PCC shared
 memory regions related macros

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:33 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
> This set of 3 small patches intend to consolidate and replace the existing
> locally defined macros within couple of PCC client drivers when accessing
> the command and status bitfields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
> Sudeep Holla (3):
>       ACPI: PCC: Add PCC shared memory region command and status bitfields
>       i2c: xgene-slimpro: Migrate to use generic PCC shmem related macros
>       hwmon: (xgene) Migrate to use generic PCC shmem related macros
>
>  drivers/hwmon/xgene-hwmon.c            | 16 +++++-----------
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xgene-slimpro.c | 16 ++++------------
>  include/acpi/pcc.h                     | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> ---

This is fine with me.

How do you want to route it?