linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Clean up errors in nfs3proc.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:08:31 -0400
From:   Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     KaiLong Wang <wangkailong@...i.cn>
Cc:     "jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
        "kolga@...app.com" <kolga@...app.com>,
        Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@...cle.com>,
        "tom@...pey.com" <tom@...pey.com>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Clean up errors in nfs3proc.c

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:51:55PM -0400, KaiLong Wang wrote:
> Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch:
> 
> ERROR: need consistent spacing around '+' (ctx:WxV)
> ERROR: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:VxW)
> 
> Signed-off-by: KaiLong Wang <wangkailong@...i.cn>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I've applied 1/4, 2/4, and 4/4. I'm still debating whether to apply
3/4, that "char *<tab>variable" style is used everywhere (though
I kind of agree it's an eye-sore).


> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> index 268ef57751c4..3dc1386e30bc 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ nfsd3_proc_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	 * + 1 (xdr opaque byte count) = 26
>  	 */
>  	resp->count = argp->count;
> -	svc_reserve_auth(rqstp, ((1 + NFS3_POST_OP_ATTR_WORDS + 3)<<2) + resp->count +4);
> +	svc_reserve_auth(rqstp, ((1 + NFS3_POST_OP_ATTR_WORDS + 3)<<2) + resp->count + 4);

Since this line is already longer than 80 characters, I updated
this patch to split it.


>  	fh_copy(&resp->fh, &argp->fh);
>  	resp->status = nfsd_read(rqstp, &resp->fh, argp->offset,
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ nfsd3_proc_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  				SVCFH_fmt(&argp->fh),
>  				argp->len,
>  				(unsigned long long) argp->offset,
> -				argp->stable? " stable" : "");
> +				argp->stable ? " stable" : "");
>  
>  	resp->status = nfserr_fbig;
>  	if (argp->offset > (u64)OFFSET_MAX ||
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 
Chuck Lever