linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] serial: core: tidy invalid baudrate handling in uart_get_baud

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:07:38 -0700
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] serial: core: tidy invalid baudrate handling in uart_get_baud_rate

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 07:26:40PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> > @@ -539,6 +537,7 @@ uart_get_divisor(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int baud)
> >  {
> >       unsigned int quot;
> >
> > +     WARN_ON(baud == 0);
>
> Why is this needed?  If this isn't happening today, then there's no need
> to check for this here.

I'll drop it then.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max