[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230928102504.5c751249@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:25:04 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the mm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
between commit:
5c7b459f9f1d ("xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker")
from the mm tree and commit:
176ccb99e207 ("xfs: Convert to bdev_open_by_path()")
from the vfs-brauner tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 9e7ba04572db,003e157241da..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@@ -1943,9 -1945,7 +1943,7 @@@ voi
xfs_free_buftarg(
struct xfs_buftarg *btp)
{
- struct block_device *bdev = btp->bt_bdev;
-
- unregister_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker);
+ shrinker_free(btp->bt_shrinker);
ASSERT(percpu_counter_sum(&btp->bt_io_count) == 0);
percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists