[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a27a3341379b9679174f7c5143bbeb3@milecki.pl>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:31:20 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] nvmem: core: Expose cells through sysfs
On 2023-09-22 19:48, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The binary content of nvmem devices is available to the user so in the
> easiest cases, finding the content of a cell is rather easy as it is
> just a matter of looking at a known and fixed offset. However, nvmem
> layouts have been recently introduced to cope with more advanced
> situations, where the offset and size of the cells is not known in
> advance or is dynamic. When using layouts, more advanced parsers are
> used by the kernel in order to give direct access to the content of
> each
> cell, regardless of its position/size in the underlying
> device. Unfortunately, these information are not accessible by users,
> unless by fully re-implementing the parser logic in userland.
>
> Let's expose the cells and their content through sysfs to avoid these
> situations. Of course the relevant NVMEM sysfs Kconfig option must be
> enabled for this support to be available.
>
> Not all nvmem devices expose cells. Indeed, the .bin_attrs attribute
> group member will be filled at runtime only when relevant and will
> remain empty otherwise. In this case, as the cells attribute group will
> be empty, it will not lead to any additional folder/file creation.
>
> Exposed cells are read-only. There is, in practice, everything in the
> core to support a write path, but as I don't see any need for that, I
> prefer to keep the interface simple (and probably safer). The interface
> is documented as being in the "testing" state which means we can later
> add a write attribute if though relevant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
# hexdump -C /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/u-boot-env0/cells/ipaddr@15c
00000000 31 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 31 2e 31
|192.168.1.1|
0000000b
--
Rafał Miłecki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists