[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230928041043.enn5jomedgybe4w7@frugally>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 23:10:43 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <vigneshr@...com>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<kristo@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<u-kumar1@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 7/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j712s2-mcu: Add the mcu
domain watchdog instances
On 06:44-20230928, Keerthy wrote:
> There are totally 2 instances of watchdog module in MCU domain.
> These instances are coupled with the MCU domain R5F instances.
> Disabling them as they are not used by Linux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> ---
>
> Changes:
>
> * Corrected subject.
Thank you. But, I'd suggest a cooling off period of a week before you
post another version to the list (and that will allow others to comment
as well if required).
While you do that, please don't send a partial patch resend unless
requested by maintainer and the maintainer is willing to handle the
extra step of hand cherry-picking the patch.
At least in my personal workflow with mutt scripts integrated to b4 the
way I do it.. it breaks my work flow.
https://gist.github.com/nmenon/98b936633bb738cf867ae33ccf5ddd5f
https://lpc.events/event/11/contributions/983/attachments/759/1421/Doing%20more%20with%20lore%20and%20b4.pdf
If you haven't converted to b4 and lei, I suggest looking at it ;)
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists