[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12332a87-e8c3-4cf3-849a-080e4e3f4521@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 19:53:08 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] net: ethernet: stmmac: stm32: support the
phy-supply regulator binding
> +static int phy_power_on(struct stm32_dwmac *bsp_priv, bool enable)
I find this function name confusing, since 50% of the time it does not
actually power the PHY on. You never call it with anything other than
a static true/false value. So it might was well be two functions,
phy_power_on() and phy_power_off().
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device *dev = bsp_priv->dev;
> +
> + if (!bsp_priv->regulator)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(bsp_priv->regulator);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "fail to enable phy-supply\n");
Not all PHYs are usable in 0 picoseconds. You probably want a delay
here. Otherwise the first few accesses to it might not work.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists