linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] Documentation: dpll: Fix code blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4731c8da-3dfa-47da-baf1-26df019d08ee@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:42:04 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
        Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] Documentation: dpll: Fix code blocks



On 9/27/23 22:27, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> kernel test robot and Stephen Rothwell report htmldocs warnings:
> 
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:427: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 18 supplied.
> 
> .. code-block:: c
> 	<snipped>...
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:444: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 21 supplied.
> 
> .. code-block:: c
> 	<snipped>...
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:474: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.
> 
> .. code-block:: c
> 	<snipped>...
> 
> Fix these above by adding missing blank line separator after code-block
> directive.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309180456.lOhxy9gS-lkp@intel.com/
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230918131521.155e9e63@canb.auug.org.au/
> Fixes: dbb291f19393b6 ("dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface")
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> index bb52f1b8c0be31..01eb4de867036f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ The simplest implementation is in the OCP TimeCard driver. The ops
>  structures are defined like this:
>  
>  .. code-block:: c
> +
>  	static const struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
>  		.lock_status_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get,
>  		.mode_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get,
> @@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ structures are defined like this:
>  The registration part is then looks like this part:
>  
>  .. code-block:: c
> +
>          clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
>          bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
>          if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
> @@ -472,6 +474,7 @@ The registration part is then looks like this part:
>  In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
>  
>  .. code-block:: c
> +
>          while (i) {
>                  --i;
>                  dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);

-- 
~Randy