linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] serial: core: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230928221246.13689-5-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:12:44 +0200
From:   Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org
Cc:     shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, l.sanfilippo@...bus.com,
        LinoSanfilippo@....de, lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] serial: core: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings

From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>

Among other things uart_sanitize_serial_rs485() tests the sanity of the RTS
settings in a RS485 configuration that has been passed by userspace.
If RTS-on-send and RTS-after-send are both set or unset the configuration
is adjusted and RTS-after-send is disabled and RTS-on-send enabled.

This however makes only sense if both RTS modes are actually supported by
the driver.

With commit be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct") the code does
take the driver support into account but only checks if one of both RTS
modes are supported. This may lead to the errorneous result of RTS-on-send
being set even if only RTS-after-send is supported.

Fix this by changing the implemented logic: First clear all unsupported
flags in the RS485 configuration, then adjust an invalid RTS setting by
taking into account which RTS mode is supported.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct")
Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index 697c36dc7ec8..f4feebf8200f 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1370,19 +1370,27 @@ static void uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_rs4
 		return;
 	}
 
+	rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+
 	/* Pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
-	if ((supported_flags & (SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) &&
-	    !(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
+	if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
 	    !(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
-		dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
-			"%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
-			port->name, port->line);
-		rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
-		rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
-		supported_flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
-	}
+		if (supported_flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) {
+			rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+			rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
 
-	rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+			dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+				"%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
+				port->name, port->line);
+		} else {
+			rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
+			rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+
+			dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+				"%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_AFTER_SEND instead\n",
+				port->name, port->line);
+		}
+	}
 
 	uart_sanitize_serial_rs485_delays(port, rs485);
 
-- 
2.40.1