lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA1PR20MB49537BCE9EF342B55174B829BBC1A@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:24:54 +0800
From:   Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     aou@...s.berkeley.edu, chao.wei@...hgo.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com,
        guoren@...nel.org, jszhang@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, palmer@...belt.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com, Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Chen Wang <wangchen20@...as.ac.cn>,
        Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] dt-bindings: timer: Add Sophgo sg2042 CLINT timer

>
>On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 08:34:42AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  compatible:
>>>> +    oneOf:
>>>> +      - items:
>>>> +          - const: sophgo,sg2042-clint-mtimer
>>>
>>> There's only one of these, so you don't need the oneOf.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> Also, is the clint here not a thead IP? In which case, you need to add a
>>
>> Yes, The clint is a thead IP, like that of th1520 and allwinner D1.
>>
>>> second compatible IMO. That second compatible then would be the one that
>>> appears in opensbi etc.
>>>
>>
>> As this is a thead IP, maybe use thead,c900-clint-mtimer is fine?
>
>I would suggest calling it -aclint-mtimer instead of clint-mtimer.
>

It is OK for me. As I describe below, now use sophgo as vendor is better.
Anyway, I will add a new second one in the next patch.

>> If so, whether we should replace the "thead,c900-clint" with these separate
>> DT to describe the thead clint?
>
>No, since that's a different device, right?
>

Yes. It seems sophgo defined these by themselves, but the T-HEAD. Sorry
for my mistake.

>> The DT binding said the thead clint is not
>> compatible with the sifive clint, so maybe this is a chance to just move
>> them out.
>
>I don't think that it really makes sense to do that.
>
>Thanks,
>Conor.
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ